Video Penuh Debat Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim VS Datuk Ahmad Shabery Cheek
I watched the delayed live telecast of the debate between Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Datuk Ahmad Shabery Cheek just now on TV3.
I’m now looking for the full video from the internet. If I’m not mistaken, TV3 said it’ll be on their website http://www.tv3.com.my but I can’t seem to find it. Perhaps, they have not uploaded it on the web yet?
Anyway, I think it’s fair to say that Datuk Ahmad Shabery Cheek did exceptionally well, considering Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is an amazing orator.
I might comment on the debate in a bit.
————————————–
Go to HOME
Go to SITE MAP
Go to DISCLAIMER
Visit Nadlique’s Forum of Financial Freedom
Visit Pumpy’s CFD Trading Journal
Visit Lumpy’s Movie Reviews
Visit Nadlique’s Blog in Bahasa Melayu
Other related posts:
- Why Everyone Should be Wealthy
- Lessons from Cashflow 101 Game
- Why Not Everyone Can be Wealthy
- What is Financial Freedom
- Passive Income Exceeding Expenses
- Journey Towards Financial Freedom: Food for Thought
- What is more important to you? Money or Family & Friends?
- Who’s richer? Siapa lagi kaya? Part 1
- Who’s richer? Siapa lagi kaya? Part 2
12 Responses to “Video Penuh Debat Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim VS Datuk Ahmad Shabery Cheek”
Leave a Reply
[...] regards to my previous post, I have found the full video of the debate between Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Datuk Ahmad Shabery [...]
[...] usual, a lot of people blogged about it and you can see and judge based on their response. Even the torrent [...]
Debat diantara Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Datuk Ahmad Shabery.
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim adalah pendebat yang terbaik. mengupas isu minyak demi rakyat. Manakala si pencacai Paklah ” Datuk Ahmad Shabery ” pulak merapu-rapu umpama lidah bercabang menceritakan kisah-kisah dongeng kerajaan sekarang membantu rakyat lepas minyak naik. Lain soalan ditanya lain jawapan merapu yang diberi. Jika anda ada otak untuk berfikir. Fikir le sendiri ulasan si Shabery yang merapu-rapu itu. Si Khairy menantu Pak Lah plak ibarat ayam berkokok. Tapi penakut nak berdebat dengan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Mengunakan Shabery sebagai ujian berdepan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang sememangnya berjuang demi RAKYAT MALAYSIA. Hidup Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim… semoga perjuangan anda sampai kemuncaknya penumbangan kerajaan BN….
p/s : kepada En.Shabery, lain kali ikut kata telunjuk orang lama. otai UMNO dah kata jangan… jangan dijolok sarang tebuan.. kan dah bengkak muka…
Pada pendapat saya, “hands down” Datuk Shabery Cheek menang debat malam tadi. Memang, ada juga “personal attacks” yang dibuat oleh Datuk Shabery, tapi saya rasa, dia dapat menangkis segala serangan Anwar dengan baik. Malah, Datuk Shabery juga menyampaikan hujah-hujah yang bernas dan logik.
Kalau kita dengar betul-betul debat semalam, Datuk Seri Anwar banyak tidak menjawab soalan. Asyik dok pusing ke tempat lain.
Zulaq, saya rasa, tak payahlah nak libatkan Khairy pula dalam isu ini. Dan tak payahlah nak kutuk mengutuk.
Haha I can’t wait for your comment on the debate! I was reading some blogs and some blog comments about how Datuk Shabery kept making personal attacks but honestly, imo, THAT ISN’T THE POINT. DS Anwar kept slipping in self-trumpeting and campaign taglines along the lines of ‘turunkan harga minyak ESOK’ too, but I think most people in the blogosphere are too riled up about BN to give them a speaking chance.
Imo both speakers did have valid points, though both parties could have handles themselves more professionally- in Datuk Shabery’s case, yes, he should have kept down the personal attacks.
However he did make some good points (i.e. whose suffering does the subsidy actually alleviate? those who need it or those who don’t? simple economics at work here!). I think that really is food for thought! I cannot deny that the price hike is a burden, but surely there are better, more effective ways to overcome it.
Personally I think what Datuk Shabery lacked was proper elaboration and substantiation. He handled his points in a very hit-and-run manner- hover around the edges of an argument, then launch into a personal attack. Which is unwise, given that his position his more vulnerable then DS Anwar’s, as he is on the defensive.
DS Anwar has a point, that perhaps the hike was too much, (I can’t say for sure, I’m happy to admit I’m rather ignorant in these matters), but it was pretty obvious how he kept pandering to the whims of the watchful public by emphasising and reemphasising on ‘rakyat’ and ’suffering’ and ‘nelayan’ and ‘petani’, and suggesting such easy-to-say short term measures- cutting down reserves and etc. when the feasibility is very debatable.
And I’m wondering, and cannot for the life of me figure out, WHY isn’t there a single economist in the country who can step forward and explain in detail, the cons of an ongoing petrol subsidy! Ours is already one of the highest in the world.
Sigh I am glad I found you in the blogosphere, Nadlique. Haha. I wanted to comment about this on my blog too but I decided against it because, well, I don’t want to attract unwanted attention and have all these young smart-aleck readers (who are ahem actually probably older than me) slam me for reasons I don’t agree with. I’ll just have my blood boil!! Grr.
Alright sorry for this ranty comment! Do correct me wherever you think I’m wrong!
(:
p.s. my internet is a wee bit screwy and i have no idea if my comment on this post got submitted but if it did, DELETE THIS THANKS! but if it didn’t here it is! (:
Haha I can’t wait for your comment on the debate! I was reading some blogs and some blog comments about how Datuk Shabery kept making personal attacks but honestly, imo, THAT ISN’T THE POINT. DS Anwar kept slipping in self-trumpeting and campaign taglines along the lines of ‘turunkan harga minyak ESOK’ too, but I think most people in the blogosphere are too riled up about BN to give them a speaking chance.
Imo both speakers did have valid points, though both parties could have handles themselves more professionally- in Datuk Shabery’s case, yes, he should have kept down the personal attacks.
However he did make some good points (i.e. whose suffering does the subsidy actually alleviate? those who need it or those who don’t? simple economics at work here!). I think that really is food for thought! I cannot deny that the price hike is a burden, but surely there are better, more effective ways to overcome it.
Personally I think what Datuk Shabery lacked was proper elaboration and substantiation. He handled his points in a very hit-and-run manner- hover around the edges of an argument, then launch into a personal attack. Which is unwise, given that his position his more vulnerable then DS Anwar’s, as he is on the defensive.
DS Anwar has a point, that perhaps the hike was too much, (I can’t say for sure, I’m happy to admit I’m rather ignorant in these matters), but it was pretty obvious how he kept pandering to the whims of the watchful public by emphasising and reemphasising on ‘rakyat’ and ’suffering’ and ‘nelayan’ and ‘petani’, and suggesting such easy-to-say short term measures- cutting down reserves and etc. when the feasibility is very debatable.
And I’m wondering, and cannot for the life of me figure out, WHY isn’t there a single economist in the country who can step forward and explain in detail, the cons of an ongoing petrol subsidy! Ours is already one of the highest in the world.
Sigh I am glad I found you in the blogosphere, Nadlique. Haha. I wanted to comment about this on my blog too but I decided against it because, well, I don’t want to attract unwanted attention and have all these young smart-aleck readers (who are ahem actually probably older than me) slam me for reasons I don’t agree with. I’ll just have my blood boil!! Grr.
Alright sorry for this ranty comment! Do correct me wherever you think I’m wrong!
(:
Well both parties do their best as politician. Keep running around the bush…not much conclusive result
for the rakyat..where does it takes from here..just my 2 sen.
Bravo DSAI,you did a good job.May Allah bless you and all of us.
Kita orang melayu x payah berbalah sesama sendiri. Orang cina duk tepuk tangan kat kita. Sekaranglah masa yang terbaik bagi memupuk semangat kemelayuan dan semangat umno demi memelihara dan mempertahankan tanah air kita iaitu tanah melayu yang tercinta, institusi raja-raja, hak keistimewaan orang melayu. Tak cukupkah hak-hak kita sebagai orang melayu berani dipersoalkan terutamanya DAP malah PKR sendiri mahu menafikan hak kita. Di parlimen, mereka ini bagai Kiasu (cam orang singapura juga lah) lantang mempersoalkan pada hal ini telah termaktub dalam perlembagaan. Mereka ni berani mempertikai hak-hak orang melayu. Oleh itu ingatlah wahai bangsa melayu bersatulah dan jangan memandang cita-cita yang berteraskan isu peribadi dan hanya mahu mementingkan diri sendiri untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri demi untuk kepuasan diri sendiri. Ingatlah bala yang menimpa Anwar Ibrahim adalah balasan dari Allah swt diatas kekufurannya sendiri. Kalau x ada angin masakan pokok bergoyang. Apa pun isu yang dibawa adalah semata-mata untuk meraih simpati orang ramai sedangkan kalau dikaji mereka ini dah kaya pun. Apa-apa terjadi kat orang melayu di Malaysia ni mereka boleh dapat suaka politik dengan senang terutama di AS. Malah mereka ini juga ada harta di luar negara. Gajah sama gajah bergaduh pelatuk mati ditengah-tengah. Oleh itu beranilah bersumpah didepan Al Quran jika tidak melakukannya tanpa banyak alasan. Sepuluh tahun yang lalu kita dikejutkan dengan tindakan orang masjid dan surau yang sanggup mengadakan sembahyang hajat untuk memusnahkan Perdana Menteri ketika itu tapi yang terjadi adalah sebaliknya PM masih sihat dan waras sehingga ke hari ini tetapi Anwar sentiasa tak sihat dan sentiasa dirundung bala dan malang. Allah maha besar dan tidakkah itu menjadi teladan kepada semua dan sebab itulah Anwar tak berani bersumpah. Melayu jangan mudah lupa lagi.
Menarik perspektif cik Siti. Terima kasih kerana berkongsi.
Wow!! It’s getting better and better. Keep it up man.,
At you the excellent site, a lot of useful info and good design, thank.,