Are Commission Driven Financial Planners Independent?

July 5th, 2009

Personally, I think that if one calls himself or herself a financial planner, one has a duty to provide a service that is in the best interest of the client. This includes exercising INDEPENDENCE from the part of the financial planner.

However, if you think about it, how do you exercise independence if you’re providing financial advice while at the same time attached to a particular organisation?

For example, a unit trust consultant who’s working for a single unit trust company and at the same time giving out advice to his/her clients. Do you think he or she will recommend products other than the ones that’ll yield commission payments?

That’s why I’m a bit wary when any non-independent financial planners try to give out any advice to me.  I need to exercise an extra degree of caution, so to speak.

Anyway, what do you guys think? Share your thoughts below.

By the way, I’m at the moment a proponent of a fee-for-service financial planners. In other words, you’re getting a non-commission driven advice.

————————————–

Go to HOME
Go to ARCHIVES
Go to DISCLAIMER


Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind


     Subscribe to my Blog

    About

    This blog is about the journey of a 23-year-old Malaysian towards financial freedom. This blog was started back when the blogger was 21 years old, although his journey towards financial freedom had begun way before that. Materials such as investing, business, equities, and derivatives are presented. The author also posts his daily thoughts and observations. Harsh words are not welcomed!

    Subscribe to my Blog!:

    Delivered by FeedBurner



    My Online Biz
    Will be listed in the future.
    Link Exchange
    Do you want to exchange links with me? Do contact me.
    Blogroll


Admin