Recap and personal comments on Debat Minyak Datuk Seri Anwar and Datuk Shabery (PART 2)

Part 1 is located here…

A panel posed a question to Datuk Shabery regarding government’s action a number of years ago to increase petrol prices by 30 cents in which he wanted to know where the money saved from that decision went to. It was said that the money was supposed to be used to improve our public transportation facilities. If I remember correctly, Datuk Shabery failed to answer this. I myself am interested to know. To me, the same problems that we had a number of years ago are still present to this day. Why weren’t there any improvements? How was the money spent?
Further into the debate, Datuk Seri Anwar argued that each $1 (I can’t recall whether it was in Ringgit or US Dollar) the price of oil increases, Petronas will benefit by $260 million. Datuk Shabery rebutted with “Kita pengeluar minyak nombor berapa? Kita net exporter kecil saja.” (not exact quote).

Datuk Shabery added that only 26% of Petronas’ profits comes from the domestic market while the rest are from overseas’ investments. He went on posing a series of questions to the audience, “What will happen when oil runs out in Malaysia? What will happen when we are a net importer?”. That’s why we are investing overseas, says Datuk Shabery. I have to say, that is a good point.

With regards to how petrol subsidies are to be sourced, Datuk Seri Anwar insisted that Petronas’ funds won’t be touched. Well, the thing is, throughout the blogosphere, when his supporters were asked how petrol subsidies should be funded, a lot of people responded with “Petronas kan ada! Petronas kan banyak duit!”. That’s also how I came to the conclusion that Pakatan Rakyat‘s plan is to “slaughter” Petronas to derive money for the purpose of subsidies.

To me, the highlight of the evening was when Datuk Seri Anwar was asked the question of what will happen if oil runs out by 2012 (or was it 2015?) and we become a net importer. Can the subsidies be sustained?

Why I said this was the highlight of the evening is because of Datuk Seri Anwar running around the bush, not answering or addressing the question at all. If I remember correctly, he responded with remarks like “who said oil will run out” and etc. He also went on and on talking about IPP and diesel. He also said isn’t it possible to get just RM1 billion from Petonas’ special dividend to ease the rakyat‘s pain? May I remind you to look at the question. He did not answer it. Datuk Shabery stated “if” oil runs out, what is your plan? He was not saying oil will definitely run out by the mentioned date. Datuk Seri Anwar should have talked about his plans on how to tackle the subsidy issue when we become a net importer in the future.

Another interesting fact told by Datuk Shabery is that already 91% of Petronas Berhad’s (not the whole group) profit was handed over to the government. He then stressed “what else do we want to take from them?”

So, there you go, a short recap of what happened that night. I could have elaborated a bit better but oh well, nobody wants to read if it was too long.

Anyway, I believe that personal attacks from Datuk Shabery’s side should have been kept to the absolute minimum and time saved from that could have been used to further substantiate his arguments and ideas. Datuk Shabery kept on making irrelevant remarks about Datuk Seri Anwar and his demonstrations and protests in the past, his problems and IMF, and how he didn’t do a good job when he was in power. Honestly, I thought Datuk Shabery shouldn’t have touched those issues at all. Oh well, there were also sinister remarks made by Datuk Seri Anwar himself.

All in all, it is in my opinon that the Menteri Penerangan Datuk Shabery Cheek was somewhat successful in explaining the government’s stand to increase the petrol price.

P.S. I also happen to agree with the statement made by one of the panels to Datuk Seri Anwar. Why can’t you just share your amazing ideas and plans with the government instead of talking about changing governments?

————————————–

Go to HOME
Go to SITE MAP
Go to DISCLAIMER

Visit Nadlique’s Forum of Financial Freedom

Visit Pumpy’s CFD Trading Journal

Visit Lumpy’s Movie Reviews

Visit Nadlique’s Blog in Bahasa Melayu

Other related posts:

Why Everyone Should be Wealthy
Lessons from Cashflow 101 Game
Why Not Everyone Can be Wealthy
What is Financial Freedom
Passive Income Exceeding Expenses
Journey Towards Financial Freedom: Food for Thought
What is more important to you? Money or Family & Friends?
Who’s richer? Siapa lagi kaya? Part 1
Who’s richer? Siapa lagi kaya? Part 2

About nadlique

This blog is about the journey of a 28-year-old Malaysian towards financial freedom. This blog was started back when the blogger was 21 years old. However, his journey towards financial freedom had begun way before that. Materials such as investing, business, entrepreneurship, equities, and real estate are presented. The author also posts his thoughts and observations on life in general.

Comments

  1. Perambut says:

    Nadlique…. I agree with u…
    RM2.70-RM0.50=RM2.20 > RM1.92 (Ini namanya kenaikan)

    I tanya sorang kawan i (penyokong fanatik anwar), “kenapa anwar nak turun kan RM0.50 je?” Kawan i jawab dengan marah “kan anwar kata, itu permulaan, nnti turun lagi, tak boleh turun mendadak nnti ekonomi lumpuh”

    hahaha… turun harga minyak ekonomi lumpuh? (itu la kata2 sorang penyokong fanatik)

    Ada satu persoalan yang i tak dpt jwpn sampai hari ni, “negara mana yang pernah menurunkan harga minyak?” (Bukan menurunkan harga setelah kenaikan harga, mcm yang anwar nak buat ni…hehehe)

  2. Tu lah, pendapat saya, sokong tu sokong jugak, tapi tak boleh sampai ke tahap fanatik. Saya tengok, sesetengah org tu, terlampau fanatik sgt, sampai apa benda pemimpin tu cakap pun, angguk je. This applies to both the supporters of the opposition and the government.

Speak Your Mind

*

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2019 · Faliq Fauzi · Log in